Local journalists grapple with Oklahoma tornadoes; Obama administration targets Fox News reporter; Michael Smerconish on political polarization; Howard puts Google Glass to the test
Stewart has shown that reporters and pundits are in the entertainment business. Reporters et al will agree that this is true but it is not important. However, a teacher would be fired if her lectures were as unpredictable and disorganized as the events the news media must investigate. She would also lose her license if her lectures were repeatedly interrupte by advertisements featuring sexually attractive actresses. But no one in the journalism profession is interested in become more effective by communicating at least once a year like a teacher would. The pre-crisis investigative journalism on subprime mortgages and the housing bubble were both prescient and worthless. The hard work by some reporters were completely ignored by politicians because their work was ignored by voters. But this problem could have been overcome with an annual one week remedial education course for voters. But reporters are not interested in communicating better. Can someone tell me why?
Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover. Host Howard Kurtz is the nation's premier media critic, and each week he questions print reporters, television correspondents and Internet bloggers about how the press is covering the major stories of the week.
Stewart has shown that reporters and pundits are in the entertainment business. Reporters et al will agree that this is true but it is not important. However, a teacher would be fired if her lectures were as unpredictable and disorganized as the events the news media must investigate. She would also lose her license if her lectures were repeatedly interrupte by advertisements featuring sexually attractive actresses. But no one in the journalism profession is interested in become more effective by communicating at least once a year like a teacher would. The pre-crisis investigative journalism on subprime mortgages and the housing bubble were both prescient and worthless. The hard work by some reporters were completely ignored by politicians because their work was ignored by voters. But this problem could have been overcome with an annual one week remedial education course for voters. But reporters are not interested in communicating better. Can someone tell me why?