Are media turning on Obama over scandals? Reporter opts for major preventative surgery; Barbara Walters announces her retirement; Media goes crazy for Prince Harry.
So Howard, do I have this straight? Your panel talks about Murdoch-owned newspapers calling Wayne LaPierre "a gun nut", but you don't even mention Piers Morgan calling Larry Pratt "incredibly stupid" and "a dangerous man"? Between Piers Morgan, Don Lemon and Soledad O'Brien, CNN became the gun-grabbing network last week. Show some consistency and some backbone, for crying out loud.
The intellectual dishonesty of this episode is truly astonishing. Their definition of a effective debate is one where their particular ideology prevails. This is presupposing the conslusions they want to prevail, without an honest examination of all the relevant evidence, and is by definition intellectually dishonest. Their continual misrepresentation of those with a different view on this issue is truly shameful.
Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover. Host Howard Kurtz is the nation's premier media critic, and each week he questions print reporters, television correspondents and Internet bloggers about how the press is covering the major stories of the week.
So Howard, do I have this straight? Your panel talks about Murdoch-owned newspapers calling Wayne LaPierre "a gun nut", but you don't even mention Piers Morgan calling Larry Pratt "incredibly stupid" and "a dangerous man"? Between Piers Morgan, Don Lemon and Soledad O'Brien, CNN became the gun-grabbing network last week. Show some consistency and some backbone, for crying out loud.
The intellectual dishonesty of this episode is truly astonishing. Their definition of a effective debate is one where their particular ideology prevails. This is presupposing the conslusions they want to prevail, without an honest examination of all the relevant evidence, and is by definition intellectually dishonest. Their continual misrepresentation of those with a different view on this issue is truly shameful.