January 1st, 2012
01:50 PM ET

Media Monitor (Jan 1)

A New York Times executive's golden parachute, rape allegations against a sportswriter and more.

Filed under: Media Monitor
soundoff (3 Responses)
  1. coches audi km 0

    I believe this is one of the so much important information for me. And i'm satisfied studying your article. However want to observation on some general things, The site style is perfect, the articles is truly excellent : D. Good process, cheers

    April 5, 2012 at 3:01 am | Reply
  2. n

    i was watching your show, and you lost me when you started talking about MSNBC's coverage of the upcoming iowa polls. you'd think a show about media missteps would check on things. the story was reported as if it was something new, MSNBC has had more or less the same line up for the last 4+ years, give or take Keith Obermann. so there's not much of a story there. another thing i find astounding is calling FOX's coverage as having real journalists, using Megan Kelly as a journalist. seriously? for a journalist you have an EXTREMELY low bar for what constitutes journalism. she is little more than a talking head, and, if you'd like to go head to head, Rachel Maddow has actually broke a few stories, thanks to her – gasp – journalism. remember the story about uganda's homophobic laws? that was Maddow's. what has Ms. kelly contributed?

    sloppy work for a show that is supposed to be critical of the news. perhaps you ought to get your own house in order first.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:19 pm | Reply
    • Fernando

      I was also at the Crunchup to announce our own new Twitter avesrtiding model called Adtweets which is a new ad-platform that allows established ad-networks to leverage the power of the retweet (something we feel we have extensive knowledge within.) by allowing current display adverts to gain a retweetable element. If you want to read the full details we have a separate post.

      March 4, 2012 at 11:52 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.