Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover.
Brian Stelter is the host of "Reliable Sources" and the senior media correspondent for CNN Worldwide. Before he joined CNN in November 2013, Stelter was a media reporter for The New York Times. He is the author of the New York Times best-seller "Top of the Morning."
Great article and right to the point. I am not sure if this is in fact the best place to ask but do you folks have any thoughts on where to employ some professional writers? Thx 🙂
I am just writing to make you know of the extraordinary encounter my friend's child gained viewing your site. She came to find numerous details, which included how it is like to possess a great giving character to get the rest smoothly grasp specific tricky matters. You really did more than readers' expectations. Many thanks for churning out those priceless, trusted, edifying as well as fun thoughts on this topic to Ethel.
Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the imeags aren't loading properly. I'm not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I've tried it in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.
Excuse me, Howard. CNN's Wolf Blitzer used to work for the Jerusalem Post and AIPAC, both of which are supporters of the ethnic cleansing country of Israel. However, you never call Blitzer racist. You are a hypocrite.
White liberal parents have the same conversation with their kids but would never admit it. Would you white liberals be OK with your kids getting lost in an all-black neighborhood?
White liberals use euphemisms. They say things such as avoid "dangerous" neighborhoods. Their kids get the drift.
The brave troops of WW II did not have camrea crews following them all over the place. And in WW II the camrea crews supported the troops and the war and did not go out of their way to embarrass the troops or make them look bad. Today the networks are a bunch of flaming liberals who will do whatever it takes to improve their ratings and further their cut and run agenda.Perhaps you should ask why are new reporters of today such jerks and not professionals like they were in WW Two.
National Review editor Rich Lowry is no profile in courage or principle here. No one should really surprised that Derbyshire wrote anything like this most recent rant. Certainly not Rich Lowry. It isn’t like Derbyshire didn’t assert himself years ago that he is a racist. As Lowry himself says Derbyshire has been playing close to the lines on this stuff for years.
The National Review has profited by playing to the lowest common denominator in this regard. If Derbyshire’s racism mattered to the National Review they would have disassociated themselves from him years ago. Now that there is a particular uproar they bailed. Lowry made a business decision not one made on principle. This is very similar to MSNBC's actions with Don Imus and ESPN action's with Rush Limbaugh. Their star agitator says something out of bounds and for once there is a significant uproar. Suddenly the news outlet grasps the pearls and acts as if they are shocked, shocked.
Lowry publishes racist trash then fires the guy for writing it? B.S. And doesn't even apologise but that's ok with Mr. Kurtz.