Deep Throat Questions
Mark Feldstein, Fred Francis and Howard Kurtz examine a new book that casts doubt on some of the details of Bob Woodward's meetings with his Watergate source.
About "Reliable Sources"
Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover.
Subscribe on iTunes  | Instagram
Tune in every Sunday at 11am Eastern time!
About the host
Brian Stelter is the host of "Reliable Sources" and the senior media correspondent for CNN Worldwide. Before he joined CNN in November 2013, Stelter was a media reporter for The New York Times. He is the author of the New York Times best-seller "Top of the Morning."
Here's his biography. You can read his stories on this blog and at CNNMoney.com/Media/.
@cnnreliable on Twitter
Nude Sex Pics, Sexy Naked Women, Hot Girls Porn
http://sexylove.gigixo.com/?brenna
show us your own porn videos free firm boob porn hame porn videos free hd black porn viseo hot porn star
My new hot project|enjoy new website
http://nudesandalsb.gigixo.com/?princess
social network porn pics anonymous cell phone porn pics former pornstar speak against porn louis griffin cartoon porn big cock porn reviews
Sexy photo galleries, daily updated pics
http://sexyshemales.relayblog.com/?julia
ashley olson porn videos cartoon bank porn frree porn online tf2 mario kart porn room janelle porn
Sexy photo galleries, daily updated pics
http://latexdate.bestsexyblog.com/?amari
porn found on cameras brunette porn student old man and teen porn utube free porn streming videos ecuadorean pussy porn
Dirty Porn Photos, daily updated galleries
http://sexygirlcamaro.fetlifeblog.com/?america
asian forced anal porn hub unblock porn video nude porn free video porn sex 2009 jelsoft enterprises ltd big breasted handjobs amature porn
My new page
http://cars.feed.yopoint.in/?entry.arianna
kaito kailin porn girl domination porn sites british accent porn ametuer porn xxx video free sara jay porn vidioes
Study my altered engagement
http://sissyblog.twiclub.in/?gain.vanesa
erotic reading erotic boxing erotic digital art urdu erotic stories sex photo
Study my altered project
http://peggme.yopoint.in/?gain.mandy
vagian best erotic game erotic illustrations bondage erotic hotels
Adult blog with daily updates
so you want to be a sissy daddy gay male define vocabularies
http://dailyfeminisation.yopoint.in/?page.keila
valentines images free dirty sex toys old woman fat non makeup bveauty tips free baby girl clothes cannabis strains bdsm extrem free fem hypnosis
I listened to your discussion of "journalists" done by journalists. Wow. The inane banter demonstrated how far off the road you journalists have gotten. You all appear to more interested in the book deal and the movie deal than the real story.
A good journalist can make any story understandable even if it requires letting the air out of the story.. To say that Woodward was a great journalist is just plain wrong. To say that Watergate was a great story would be more correct. Woodward did not make Watergate any more understandable. He worked to made himself the story. The embellishments to make the book and the movie more dramatic make the whole work cheap.
Journalism today is too much Dan Rather. Too much spin. Too much of the "more to follow after this break" when there is no more to add.
OK, so the 70s has Animal House, Harold and Maude (in my all-time top 5), Annie Hall, this ^ movie (never seen) and Rocky Horor.But the '80 s? We've got Caddyshack, Airplane, Ordinary People, BreakSfast Club, St. Elmo's Fire, About Last Night, Amadeus, The Lost Boys, The Big Chill, Blue Velvet, This is Spinal Tap, Dangerous Liaisons, Diner, The Dead Poets Society, The Hunger, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Ghostbusters, and for the love of G-d HEATHERS, all came out in the 1980s. (Not to mention one of YOUR faves, Raising Arizona.)You can have the 70s I'll take the 80s, and if you are lucky you can broorw some of my dvds. 🙂
Well lets start off by saying that that first aenswr you got shows that amount of moronic ignorance out there in America today. They don't question the Fox News viewers intelligence because they are Fox News watchers but rather that the viewer doesn't follow in lock step with the point of view that they in person hold. This leads us into next question; it is not that the others are less "pro-American" as it may look, they are pushing an agenda/propaganda that they want you to judge instead. It make them upset when you reckon for yourself and don't drink the koolaid they are passing out. We live in a global the upper classes and there is no way out of that, they just want to be crowned kings & worshiped as vital public instead of just doing their job honestly. "Check every fact on every channel for your own excellent read, watch, question questions and by no means judge that anyone knows everything!" Excellent luck to you in life my friend!