.
June 29th, 2012
02:27 PM ET

Sneak peek at this Sunday's show

By Cassie Spodak, CNN

The Supreme Court handed down the much anticipated ruling on the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, on Thursday – and media scrambled to translate the complicated brief. But the judgment on the President’s signature law resulted in early coverage from CNN and Fox News reporting that the individual mandate had been struck down, when in fact it was upheld as a tax. How did journalists get it so wrong?

As the confusion unfolded on air, Fox News anchors Megyn Kelly and Judge Andrew Napolitano turned to SCOTUSblog.com for clarification. The blog was the first media outlet to accurately report the ruling and the blog’s live feed of the SCOTUS ruling peaked at over 800,000 views. SCOTUSblog.com creator Tom Goldstein discusses the reporting that went on behind the scenes.

Radio host Michael Medved, Bloomberg columnist Margaret Carlson and University of Maryland journalism professor Mark Feldstein will discuss how other media outlets covered the ruling as well as how pundits have been predicting that the mandate would be thrown out for months now.

Gail Shister of TV Newser discusses how NBC handled the exit of Today show co-host Ann Curry, as well as her emotional goodbye Thursday.

The debate over the modern working woman’s ability to find work-life balance has been going on for decades. But the cover story for July’s issue of The Atlantic entitled Why Women Can’t Have It All, by former State Department official Anne-Marie Slaughter, brought the debate back to the forefront. Editor-in-chief for the Daily-Download.com Lauren Ashburn and Newsweek/Daily Beast correspondent Michelle Cottle discuss why the article’s gotten so much attention.

This Sunday at 11 a.m. ET.

Posted by
Filed under: Blog • Reliable Sources • Sneak Peek
soundoff (11 Responses)
  1. buy tadalafil us

    tadalafil 40 mg daily https://elitadalafill.com/ tadalafil 60 mg for sale

    April 16, 2021 at 3:09 am | Reply
  2. cheap erectile dysfunction pills online

    do erectile pumps work https://canadaerectiledysfunctionpills.com/ review erectile dysfunction pump

    April 15, 2021 at 9:04 pm | Reply
  3. how much is alprostadil

    alprostadil use after heart surgery https://alprostadildrugs.com/ alprostadil cream on ebay

    April 15, 2021 at 7:42 am | Reply
  4. how do i use alprostadil urethral suppository

    injectable erectile dysfunction medicine https://alprostadildrugs.com/ aloprostadil

    April 14, 2021 at 12:14 pm | Reply
  5. why vardenafil dosage over 65

    levitra vardenafil 40 mg https://vegavardenafil.com/ warnings for vardenafil

    April 13, 2021 at 10:49 am | Reply
  6. diamond painting

    726547 432617You need to indulge in a contest for one of the greatest blogs over the internet. Ill suggest this web website! 274762

    April 7, 2021 at 11:04 pm | Reply
  7. dumps with pin shop

    405838 461900Paris Hilton: So lovely spending time with Manny and h 833908

    March 21, 2021 at 9:19 am | Reply
  8. Regression testing

    583273 437566Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in reality was a amusement account it. Appear complicated to far delivered agreeable from you! However, how can we maintain in touch? 765440

    February 7, 2021 at 4:39 am | Reply
  9. bagian cpns untuk tamatan sma

    289177 835747Can you give me some tips for piece of software writing? 716077

    January 31, 2021 at 3:28 pm | Reply
  10. Free Essex Dating Website

    Hi, i think that i noticed you visited my web site so i got here to go back the prefer?.I am trying to to find issues to improve my website!I assume its ok to make use of a few of your ideas!!

    September 11, 2012 at 5:09 am | Reply
  11. D. Evans

    Mr. Kurtz, "How did journalists get it so wrong?" They didn't! The media reported the mandate had been struck down because it WAS struck down. The highly anticipated story was reported in real time. The majority redefined it as a tax in order to pass it which was also reported, in real time, as it was learned. It was rational for reporters to believe the pages upon pages of the majority opinion would merely support the striking down of the mandate, not redefine the case posed before them. As that fact was learned, it was reported. Your show on this issue is much ado about nothing in my opinion.

    July 1, 2012 at 11:48 am | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.