July 1st, 2012
12:37 PM ET

Supreme Court Pundits Get It Wrong

Margaret Carlson, Michael Medved, Mark Feldstein and Howard Kurtz discuss pundits' predictions on the health care ruling.

Filed under: Media • Media Criticism • Politics • Reliable Sources • Supreme Court
soundoff (9 Responses)
  1. storno brzinol

    After study a few of the blog posts on your website now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. Pls check out my web site as well and let me know what you think.


    May 15, 2021 at 1:55 am | Reply
  2. Charles Escribano

    I've been surfing on-line more than 3 hours nowadays, yet I never found any fascinating article like yours. It is pretty value sufficient for me. In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content material as you did, the web will probably be a lot more useful than ever before.


    March 24, 2021 at 5:17 pm | Reply
  3. Joann Marinacci


    March 4, 2021 at 9:49 am | Reply
  4. vreyrolinomit

    Wohh just what I was searching for, regards for putting up.


    February 26, 2021 at 5:10 am | Reply
  5. Fókuszpályázat

    Keep up the superb piece of work, I read few blog posts on this web site and I believe that your site is real interesting and contains circles of excellent info .


    February 9, 2021 at 4:01 am | Reply
  6. zortilonrel

    I got what you mean ,saved to my bookmarks, very nice web site.


    February 7, 2021 at 6:24 pm | Reply
  7. John

    I got repeated text messages from CNN stating simply that the mandate had been struck down. No equivocation. Then the followup message stated that that entire law had been upheld. Also wrong because of the state Medicare ruling. CNN blew it. Comparing with Fox does not mitigate that. They deserve all the bad things that might happen.

    And yes, Fox screwed up too.

    July 1, 2012 at 6:07 pm | Reply
  8. Howard Welinsky

    Kurtz screws up by falsely equating CNN with Fox News on the Supreme Court announcement. CNN said it appears the mandate was not a valid exercise of the commerce clause. It appears as if the Court struck down the mandate. Fox just said the mandate was ruled institutional. These are not the same statements. yet Kurtz makes no distinction. Listening on my car radio to CNN I knew I had to keep listening. Why does Kutz let Medved get away with stating falseinformation by saying the Court called it a tax. Roberts said it was valid under the taxing authority. The four liberals said it was on the commerce power and the taxing power.

    July 1, 2012 at 5:38 pm | Reply
    • Reham

      Next three weeks:Promote My Very Own Mail until I get two more (at least!) sweet bookworm kidods on board!Join the 28 Day Bootcamp Challenge at Sparkpeople and follow through with the daily goals.Work EVERY day for at least 2hrs. (Client work, etc.)

      September 11, 2012 at 11:51 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.