From the desk of Howard Kurtz: For Obama, it's no more Mr. Nice Media
Editor's note: Howard Kurtz is the host of CNN's "Reliable Sources."
(CNN) - The press has turned on President Obama with a vengeance.
Suddenly, the White House briefing room is filled with confrontational questions. Suddenly, the news pages are ablaze with scandal, and the commentators - even some of the president's usual defenders - are bemoaning his shortcomings. Suddenly, Obama isn't getting the benefit of the doubt.
According to Obama's longtime detractors, the denizens of the fourth estate are finally climbing out of a tank in which they have been immersed since roughly 2007. But the reality is a bit more nuanced than that.
There are a number of unsavory allegations swirling around Washington, but do not underestimate the importance of the Justice Department seizing two months of Associated Press phone records without so much as a heads-up. This not only seems like a case of prosecutorial overreach, even in a case involving national security, it strikes at the heart of what journalists do - and has fostered feelings of betrayal. Does the administration not understand the chilling effect on reporters and their sources, they wonder, or simply not care?
Read more of Howie's two cents here.
About "Reliable Sources"
Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover.
Subscribe on iTunes | Instagram
Tune in every Sunday at 11am Eastern time!
About the host
Brian Stelter is the host of "Reliable Sources" and the senior media correspondent for CNN Worldwide. Before he joined CNN in November 2013, Stelter was a media reporter for The New York Times. He is the author of the New York Times best-seller "Top of the Morning."
Here's his biography. You can read his stories on this blog and at CNNMoney.com/Media/.
@cnnreliable on Twitter
987247 662076Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing just a little research on that. And he truly bought me lunch because I identified it for him smile So let me rephrase that. 439864
This was awesome! I would like you to clean up all this spam though
https://www.linkedin.com/in/yusufhanafy
This was awesome! I would like you to clean up all this spam though
https://www.linkedin.com/in/yusufhanafy
845638 109158Your writing taste has been amazed me. Thanks, quite nice article. 170895
791788 535215Extremely good publish, thanks a great deal for sharing. Do you happen to have an RSS feed I can subscribe to? 178756
Have you ever heard of second life (sl for short). It is essentially a game where you can do anything you want. Second life is literally my second life (pun intended lol). If you want to see more you can see these Second Life websites and blogs
http://everydayliteracies.blogspot.com/2014/05/imagination-wanted-mobile-devices-in.html?showComment=1504719375937
855206 434087Interested in start up a online business on line denotes revealing your service also providers not only to humans within your town, nevertheless , to numerous future prospects which are cyberspace on numerous occasions. pays day-to-day 78489
685149 46924Spot on with this write-up, I genuinely suppose this internet site needs much a lot more consideration. probably be once a lot more to learn way much more, thanks for that info. 487104
https://www.electricpercolatorcoffeepot.com/10-top-coffee-bloggers/
Suddenly, the White House briefing room is filled with confrontational questions. Suddenly, the news pages are ablaze with scandal, and the commentators – even some of the president's usual defenders – are bemoaning his shortcomings. Suddenly, Obama isn't getting the benefit of the doubt."
CNN he is only untouchable because you made him that way.
I watch 'Reliable Sources' every week – one of the few news shows on TV for which I have respect, because it's the media critically evaluating itself. However, Mr. Kurtz et. al. greatly disappointed me this week, inasmuch as NO ONE spent anytime playing devil's advocate for the US government by outlining what was at stake in the leaks to the media that caused the US government to ask for a search warrant. When the media is the only source of news on this story, and its members can only focus on their own sense of outrage, it's hard for the average citizen to develop any appreciation for a fair, balanced view of this issue – and then the media's lack of such becomes the new story. What are you all so afraid of telling us, vis a vis the government's side of this issue?