Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more clear from this post. I'm very glad to see such fantastic information being shared freely out there.
For everyone who detected a smelly mess at FAUX NEWS, the "Ailes Book" offers a few "ah-has" that help explain the odd consistency of negative reporting from that network. The book also sheds light on Rodger Ailes' over-the-top manipulation over how and when reporters covered certain stories. Americans have come to expect a certain political bias from journalists. However, what Roger Ailes has attempted since THE PEOPLE put Obama into the White House borders on criminal. It seems that Gabriel Sherman has done a "Woodward & Bernstein" on the Ultraconservatives; delivering a substantial catalog of factoids derived from more than 600 personal and corroborated interviews.
Journalists are supposed to be critical of government. Watch Fox when there is a Democratic president... and watch CNN when there is a Republican. Every major news organization except Fox has been carrying water for this administration since he got into office.
I watch Reliable Sources regularly as I saw the show as an objective review of media coverage. The January 12th episode was certainly a disappointing low point. The Kitty Kelley-esque content by Sherman in the past seems to have continued with this Ailes book – and Brian Stelter treated this author as if he were a credible journalist. Sherman’s work is usually poorly sourced gossip – which is fine when not treated like serious journalism. The fact that he was given such a prominent and unchallenged portion of this week's show was odd considering what I thought was the context of the program. I have no problem with the Ed Schultz and Sean Hannity types as they are honest about their intent and the editorial nature of their efforts. That said, I usually don’t watch FoxNews or MSNBC because of this type of gossip-as-serious-news approach. I’ll not watch Reliable Sources again.
Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover.
Brian Stelter is the host of "Reliable Sources" and the senior media correspondent for CNN Worldwide. Before he joined CNN in November 2013, Stelter was a media reporter for The New York Times. He is the author of the New York Times best-seller "Top of the Morning."
hi, I am havin a tough time trying to rank up for the words “victorias secret coupon codes”… Please approve my comment!!
http://yourmatrixcashmachine.com
Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more clear from this post. I'm very glad to see such fantastic information being shared freely out there.
https://www.electricpercolatorcoffeepot.com/10-top-coffee-bloggers/
The worst show EVER 1/12/14!!
For everyone who detected a smelly mess at FAUX NEWS, the "Ailes Book" offers a few "ah-has" that help explain the odd consistency of negative reporting from that network. The book also sheds light on Rodger Ailes' over-the-top manipulation over how and when reporters covered certain stories. Americans have come to expect a certain political bias from journalists. However, what Roger Ailes has attempted since THE PEOPLE put Obama into the White House borders on criminal. It seems that Gabriel Sherman has done a "Woodward & Bernstein" on the Ultraconservatives; delivering a substantial catalog of factoids derived from more than 600 personal and corroborated interviews.
Journalists are supposed to be critical of government. Watch Fox when there is a Democratic president... and watch CNN when there is a Republican. Every major news organization except Fox has been carrying water for this administration since he got into office.
I watch Reliable Sources regularly as I saw the show as an objective review of media coverage. The January 12th episode was certainly a disappointing low point. The Kitty Kelley-esque content by Sherman in the past seems to have continued with this Ailes book – and Brian Stelter treated this author as if he were a credible journalist. Sherman’s work is usually poorly sourced gossip – which is fine when not treated like serious journalism. The fact that he was given such a prominent and unchallenged portion of this week's show was odd considering what I thought was the context of the program. I have no problem with the Ed Schultz and Sean Hannity types as they are honest about their intent and the editorial nature of their efforts. That said, I usually don’t watch FoxNews or MSNBC because of this type of gossip-as-serious-news approach. I’ll not watch Reliable Sources again.