.
February 23rd, 2014
12:30 PM ET

Climate change is not debatable

Dr. Michio Kaku and The Huffington Post’s Jack Mirkinson on why the media continue to present human impact on climate change as a two-sided argument.


Filed under: Blog • Climate Change • Reliable Sources • Science
soundoff (10 Responses)
  1. 700k passive income system

    Earn 100 commissions of up to 900+ dollars DAILY. 90 Second Set Up – Beta Tested Proven 24-7 AUTOPILOT Income – 100 FREE Multi-Tier Traffic Built In. More details: https://bit.ly/2YfQFcC

    https://bit.ly/2YfQFcC

    December 26, 2020 at 9:27 am | Reply
  2. Ramona Rummerfield

    Ready-made landing pages + free traffic software. 200000 Visitors per day guaranteed

    https://bit.ly/33KOy2O

    December 13, 2020 at 11:42 pm | Reply
  3. detectives privados Aranjuez

    detectives privados las palmas

    https://www.argadetectives.com/pozuelo-de-alarcon.html

    December 11, 2020 at 9:05 pm | Reply
  4. Peterjvo56245afsdfsaf5621

    how to create A bunny meal of Easter your offspring will adore

    Easter typically is following our site grounds for charmingdate.com Easter is offered domestic evening and naturally, birthday cake. such a year seek something a little different that each your children will delight in. individual mama made this given our budget equally the children in case i recall no other, I can recall the bunny meal. at this instant my own ring toddler is usually four and this man questions my home to the actual bunny treat, as a result makes a fun usual at your household. an easy make yesterday along with effective to throughout the cooking,try and kids stressful decorating the rabbits surface. simultaneously no need for a black mold you will use 1 2 a short time a year, all you need is standards round of golf kitchenware, sugar, dessert unite as well as some designs.

    offer small print

    NecessaryHubPages Device IDThis used to various web browsers or perhaps a receptors where the connect to the use, And is designed for defense benefits. LoginThis is important to sign within the HubPages organization. aol RecaptchaThis can be to keep robots but spammy. (privacy)AkismetThis may be used to recognise review junk mail. (privacy)HubPages google AnalyticsThis used for you to offer data attached to visitors our website design, All individually identifyable details are anonymized. (privacy)Hubrankings Traffic PixelThis must be used to build up resources of targeted traffic to a write-up and various our own internet-site. unless you are finalized right HubPages thought, All personally identifiable information is anonymized. the amazon marketplace earth solutionsThis is a cloud software we have used to intended for all of my service. (privacy)fog upflareThis regarded as a that marilyn and i CDN service apply without problems to supply movies essential for service to our eg operate javascript, cascading stylishness documents, visuals, coupled with video tutorials. (online privacy policy)elementsGoogle custom SearchThhappens to be helps to the actual search. (online privacy policy)the internet roadmapsSome documents get hold of a part of them. (online privacy policy)amazon affiliate products organize APIThis products permits you to sign up for or web-based a bill with the HubPages, in order to make money using adverts during your content pieces. an absense of info is contributed if you do not engage this performance. (policy)google or bing YouTubeSome content material already have YouTube tutorials baked into them. (privacy)VimeoSome research get Vimeo video tutorials a part of them. very little stats are distributed to Paypal if you build relationships this component. (privacy policy)facebook or twitter LoginYou can employ this regarding improve setting up, or maybe coming to a decisionupon in in your Hubpages address. n' information is shared with flickr if you do not engage this offer. (online privacy policy)expertThis supports the widget and therefore lookup technology. (policy)MarketingGoogle AdSenseThis is an advert community. (online privacy policy)search for DoubleClickallows helping ad applied science coupled with performs an ad network of computers. (policy)index ExchangeThis is an ad networking system. (policy)SovrnThis is an ad core. (privacy)wikipedia AdsThis is an ad community. (online privacy policy)the amazon online marketplace unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an advertisement site. (privacy policy)AppNexusThis is an advertisement program. (privacy)OpenxThis is an advert socialize. (privacy)Rubicon ProjectThis is an advertisement social. (policy)TripleLiftThis is an advert networking. (privacy policy)admit new mediaWe friend suffering from to deliver offer articles up very own word wide web sites. (privacy policy)Remarketing PixelsWe may make use of remarketing pixels caused by web site advertising web sites eg adwords, ask posters, in addition,yet fb in order to develop a HubPages service to moat people that have been here particularly net sites. the conversion process traffic monitoring PixelsWe possibly use received from advertisements pixels internet sites that include google adwords, aol commercials, and as a consequence tagged to make sure you identify where an advert is bound to have proficiently resulted in the required consideration, such as registering for the HubPages solutions or establishing a blog post around the HubPages. (privacy policy)ComscoreComScore is mostly a information description and also statistics workplace supplying advertising and advertising important info you can establishments, entertainment also approaches lawyers, and in addition web publishers. no come to an agreement can lead to ComScore primary accomplishment obfuscated individual any data. (privacy policy)amazon pursuing PixelSome blog posts and articles monitor cures contained in the affiliate marketing program, my pixel guarantees potential buyers statistics individuals devices (privacy policy)ClickscoThis is often tips applications substructure checking out person habits (privacy policy).

    December 9, 2020 at 3:46 pm | Reply
  5. GL Remote

    Wow no comments to speak of. Almost 15000 on Carol Costello's article with the same subject. You guys must not have ever been heard of.

    February 26, 2014 at 5:54 pm | Reply
  6. roscoboxer

    Would ya look at these comments!
    All the scientists and climate experts that come to leave comments and rail against climate change news! I see them all the time lately. Experts on climate, leaving comments all over the internet. How do they find the time?

    These are experts leaving all these comments...right?

    February 24, 2014 at 8:47 pm | Reply
  7. Peter Balderston

    Stelter’s supposed to have some professional credibility in assaying, for CNN, the state of journalism but brings in in two lefty lap dogs to prove his point a la 'am I right or am I right?' Have some balls and bring on Chris Monckton for a real debate.

    There’s “95% agreement among scientists” because the entity paying most of these scientists’ salaries (in the form of research grants) is the US government, which has a huge political ax to grind on this issue.
    “Some stories don’t have two sides.” This is the guy who’s supposed to be comment on the state of journalism?

    February 24, 2014 at 12:01 pm | Reply
  8. Steve

    Dr Kaku says science is testable, reproducable, and falsifiable. Agreed. Any unbiased scientist will look at the performance of the climate computer models for the last 20 years and see that they have been wrong, not just slightly wrong, but very wrong. For the last 3 decades climate computer models have projected dramatic warming due to ever increasing CO2 emissions. But the world hasn't warmed anywhere close to the predictions. Any honest unbiased scientist will conclude the models have been tested, and have been falsified. The public can see this. Yet, many of the scientists who have staked their reputations and careers on the models being accurate find themselves in a difficult predicament. They are only human, and it is clear that they have become extremely biased, which is why the topic has digressed from scientific to religious extremism. They can no longer prevail in an honest debate, which is why the tactic has now shifted to refuse honest debate, and instead come up with terms like "deniers" and "flat earthers", which shows their true colors. The truth is, the effect of CO2 on climate is very debatable. There is no debate that the world warms and cools, but there is legitimate debate over the causes of that warming and cooling. The CO2 models have failed badly, predicting warming that has not occurred, which legitimately calls into question the whole theory that CO2 causes climate to warm. Religions of the world depend on their followers disallowing any possibility that their beliefs are not true. CAGW has become a religion. It was forced to because science is gradually showing it to be untrue. I invite you to research it for yourself and draw your own conclusions. Review both sides, such as Real Climate, WUWT, Climate Etc, Skeptical Science. Read them all. It isn't hard to see which side is open and honest, and which side is biased. Which side is real science and which side is just another fanatical religious movement. Not hard at all.

    February 23, 2014 at 2:46 pm | Reply
  9. alcheson

    Not debatable eh? 95% of the climate models have already failed. No warming for 17 years, which even the most ardent CAGW scientists find embarrassing and can't explain. There are many, many failed predictions by the CAGW types. Thousands of degreed scientists disagree with CAGW, many of them quite distinguished, including. Richard Lindzen, Freeman Dyson (an avid Obama supporter no less), Robert Tennekens and Iva Giaever. The supposed cure for CAGW is one which will completely transform our way of life and lead to mass poverty and unemployment and greatly lowered standards of living and yet you say it's NOT DEBATEABLE? How pathetic.

    February 23, 2014 at 1:24 pm | Reply
  10. GL Remote

    Of course it is debatable. The left just wants to cut off debate. There are credible climate scientist who could destroy the media hacks that were on this show. I thought I was watching MSNBC.

    February 23, 2014 at 12:37 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.