Please, someone introduce to CNN the novel idea of presenting both sides of a story instead of helping the government spin. The Russian RT has posted strong evidence that Liz Wahl was/is associated with the American neo-con crowd that, most likely set her up to "take out RT" credibility. RT has posted neo-con Twitter correspondances well before the broadcast, calling attention to the upcoming announcement by Wahl. They also posted selfies with Wahl and one of the neocons together, apparently quite happy with what they had done. Shame on you CNN for providing only one-sided propaganda coverage without even mentioning the opposite views and evidence.
RT show truth facts and social movements. CNN is complete war or non stop sensationalism.
March 23, 2014 at 6:37 pm |
Alan
The difference between RT and CNN was telling when after Wahl made her announcement on RT TV, the RT English language website ran the story with video of the announcement, without any spin. Only, more than a week later, that RT ran the documentation about Wahl's neo-con connections and the apparent neo-con conspiracy to take down RT.
March 23, 2014 at 7:53 pm |
passepartout
Looks like Liz Wahl was describing Fox News and to a lesser extent CNN when speaking about biased and misleading journalism. She is another manifestation of rah-rah western journalistic bias that pervades American news media. Putin TV? Really? That confirmed my point right there.
Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover.
Brian Stelter is the host of "Reliable Sources" and the senior media correspondent for CNN Worldwide. Before he joined CNN in November 2013, Stelter was a media reporter for The New York Times. He is the author of the New York Times best-seller "Top of the Morning."
thank you for your sharing.
Surface Mounting https://hi-hyperlite.com/products/hero-series-surface-mounting
Please, someone introduce to CNN the novel idea of presenting both sides of a story instead of helping the government spin. The Russian RT has posted strong evidence that Liz Wahl was/is associated with the American neo-con crowd that, most likely set her up to "take out RT" credibility. RT has posted neo-con Twitter correspondances well before the broadcast, calling attention to the upcoming announcement by Wahl. They also posted selfies with Wahl and one of the neocons together, apparently quite happy with what they had done. Shame on you CNN for providing only one-sided propaganda coverage without even mentioning the opposite views and evidence.
Whats the difference between CNN and RT? I can't think of any
RT show truth facts and social movements. CNN is complete war or non stop sensationalism.
The difference between RT and CNN was telling when after Wahl made her announcement on RT TV, the RT English language website ran the story with video of the announcement, without any spin. Only, more than a week later, that RT ran the documentation about Wahl's neo-con connections and the apparent neo-con conspiracy to take down RT.
Looks like Liz Wahl was describing Fox News and to a lesser extent CNN when speaking about biased and misleading journalism. She is another manifestation of rah-rah western journalistic bias that pervades American news media. Putin TV? Really? That confirmed my point right there.