Former CBS News Investigative Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson talks to Brian Stelter about why she left the network. (The above video is part one; here's part two.)
After taping this interview, we sought comment from a spokeswoman for CBS News, with the hope that the network would directly respond to Attkisson's assertions. The network responded with the same statement it distributed after Attkisson resigned in March: "We appreciate her many contributions and we wish her well."
erectile problems and solutions
erectile medicine
is erectile dysfunction caused by diabetes
◆ スタイルが多い、品質がよい、価格が低い!
● SS品質 シリアル付きも有り 付属品完備!
◆ 必ずご満足頂ける品質の商品のみ販売しております.
● 品質を最大限本物と同等とする為に相応の材質にて製作している為です.
◆ 絶対に満足して頂ける品のみ皆様にお届け致します.
人気の売れ筋商品を多数取り揃えております。
全て激安特価でご提供.お願いします.
具体的には、業界、私たちも観察して西部地域に贅沢な表の検索の伸びが目立つ。特に、ブランドの認知度で最も急速に成長し、毎年8 . 4%のスピードで増加(比べ東部地区は4 . 8%)。確かに、数年前まで通り上海や北京など大都市東部のように、贅沢なブランドに殺到して西部間近表。
ロレックス アンティーク 価格 http://www.buyma.cc/copy-7-b0.html
After bringing on Media Matters, just rename Reliable Sources "Reliable Bias," and the country has no problem with this show.
Attkisson isn;t the only CBS reporter to make the claim - Bernard Goldberg has as well. read his "Slobbering Love Affair," about the media's starry-eyed, fanboy treatment of the 0bama administration.
Liberal bias in the press is a "dubious claim" because Liberals and the Press say so. Well gee, what the hell else would you expect them to say?!?
The thing that I find most disturbing was Mrs. Atkinsson's continued emphasis on how it so important for the individual reader to do in-depth research on the news that you are getting to validate its credibility. That is the problem. there is not time in a day to validate all the comments of the modern journalist. What happened to the journalist of old and Newspapers when honor and unbiased was the creed of journalism. Facts were the strength of Journalism. Now if I could find that non-red/blue tinted fact based news I could then make a credible decision on the news and have a valid opinion. But that would wipe out the need for Cable news. Just dreaming again.
Sharyl Attkisson lost all credibility when she claimed that the there is still a scientific debate about whether vaccines can be linked to autism. While this is a popular controversy among the uninformed it is long settled in the scientific community.
Attkisson has also taken up the cause of so called liberal bias in the press, another popular but dubious claim.
Is this "journalism for sale?"
Even Dr Bernadine Healy said it was not settled so why don't you refute what Attkisson turned up in her investigation instead of trying to blow it off by attacking the messenger?