September 28th, 2014
01:22 PM ET

Brian Stelter's take

At the end of Sunday's show, Brian Stelter addressed the plagiarism allegations recently leveled against CNN's Fareed Zakaria.

Here's what he said:

Finally this morning, a story about the ethical practices of television shows like this one.

Earlier this month, anonymous bloggers who call themselves Our Bad Media accused one of my colleagues, Fareed Zakaria, of plagiarism, of stealing other people's words and passing them off as their own. They cited examples from "FAREED ZAKARIA GPS," the show that airs right before this one.

I disagree with a lot of what the bloggers are alleging. But I want to take a couple of minutes here to tell you about it, because, #1, I believe media companies should be transparent, just like we want politicians and CEOs to be, and, #2, because my reporting leads me to believe that Zakaria's program made some attribution mistakes. A small number, to be fair - but they are the kinds of mistakes that other journalists can learn from, and viewers too.

First, in the interest of transparency, let me say that I trusted Zakaria before these allegations, and I still trust him after studying all of it. He is one of a kind, one of the sharpest thinkers on world affairs anywhere.

But these bloggers' claims have gotten attention partly because prior claims of plagiarism were leveled against Zakaria in 2012. Back then, another blog pointed out that he had cribbed from a "New Yorker" article while writing his column for "TIME" magazine. He said he had confused his notes, and he apologized.

CNN kept "GPS" off of to air for two weeks while it reviewed his on-air work, and then reinstated him, indicating no other serious offenses were found. Well, the bloggers at Our Bad Media claimed they did find some.

It is clear to me that these anonymous people are waging a campaign against Zakaria, not just against his CNN work, but his columns and books, too. I believe that most of their claims about "GPS" - 26 total - do not hold up under close scrutiny. The closer you look, the less it looks like capital-P plagiarism.

But when you zoom out, there's a perception problem. The perception is that, as Kelly McBride of the Poynter Institute told Politico, "It seems obvious that Fareed was overly reliant on his source material."

McBride called some of the examples low-level plagiarism. Politico reporter Dylan Byers likened them to misdemeanors.

And here is an example. One of the "What in the World?" segments on "GPS" back in June appears to have lifted two sentences from an appeals court ruling without attribution.

In a handful of other cases, it seems like parts of Zakaria's segments were inspired by articles in The Economist, The New York Times, etcetera. It seems like he took raw material from the articles, reworded a bit of it, and then added his own insights. Again, what appear to be misdemeanors, plucked from hundreds of episodes of "GPS."

But shows like "GPS" and this one strive for the highest standards.

So this is the part where I wish I could tell Zakaria's side of the story. For instance, many TV scripts are written by producers. So did Zakaria write the questionable passages himself or did his producers? But Zakaria declined to appear on-camera for an interview with me.

CNN's P.R. people have also declined to comment, other than to say that: "CNN has the highest confidence in the excellence and integrity of Fareed Zakaria's work. And we have found nothing that gives us cause for concern."

So, I can only tell you what my reporting has led me to believe. I believe the perception in this case is worse than the reality. But I understand why there have been raised eyebrows. We are in the business of raising eyebrows, after all.

Beyond just "GPS," television newscasts are inspired by newspaper and Web stories all the time. We run with their ideas, and sometimes they run with our ideas. Sometimes, we don't acknowledge it because we're short on time, and maybe, just maybe, because we want to sound all-knowing, like we didn't need the help.

That is not good enough. For people like Zakaria, for people like me - for people who read scripts on television - the pressure is on us to be generous with attribution, to figure out ways to give credit where it is due without bogging down our scripts.

I think the Web's norms of linking to the sources are becoming the world's norms. And the more transparent we are, the more trustworthy we will be.

Filed under: Reliable Sources
soundoff (13 Responses)
  1. Roslyn Trnka

    It is in reality a great and useful piece of information. I am happy that you just shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.


    January 11, 2021 at 9:35 pm | Reply
  2. Rueben Seratti

    I gotta favorite this site it seems very useful extremely helpful


    January 11, 2021 at 1:08 am | Reply
  3. make money fast

    Earn 100 commissions of up to 900+ dollars DAILY. 90 Second Set Up- 100 Newbie Friendly – Fully Hosted "MonsterMode PRO Funnel" Included FREE – Fully Scalable $10K+ Per Month Income Potential More details: Click the link in profile


    December 26, 2020 at 2:41 pm | Reply
  4. Susana Simonet

    Ready-made landing pages + free traffic software. 200000 Visitors per day guaranteed


    December 14, 2020 at 4:40 am | Reply
  5. detectives privados benalmádena

    detectives privados en pozuelo


    December 12, 2020 at 1:57 am | Reply
  6. Name*pat metoyer

    Thanks to Morning Joe for the pairing of Trump & Christie

    February 28, 2016 at 11:19 am | Reply
  7. Media guy

    Ok, if it is not capital-P plagiarism, is it small-p plagiarism? Isn't that plagiarism after all? It is sad that Stelter would try to defend Zakaria instead of requiring him to give an explanation. Trust on the media is very low and examples like this reinforce the perception that many journalists just google, copy and paste paragraphs from other sources or from the talking points they are given. Stelter, you would do CNN a favor if you requested a full explanation from Zakaria and CNN.

    September 29, 2014 at 12:53 pm | Reply
  8. Sarah P

    I honestly feel that GPS should be anchored by a moslem person preferably a lady who is not from India.

    September 28, 2014 at 3:36 pm | Reply
  9. Sarah P

    You are right on

    September 28, 2014 at 3:31 pm | Reply
    • Sarah P

      I was referring to @Leg of Lamb's comment in my post above.

      September 28, 2014 at 3:32 pm | Reply
  10. Hammond Black

    GPS needs help. Not sure it is FZ or CNN producers. But it sure looks a program with an anti moslem bent. No need for that. There are a lot of moslems doing good things equal to if not more than other denominations.

    September 28, 2014 at 3:16 pm | Reply
  11. The Leg of the Lamb©

    I do not see objectivity in Fareed's interviews. He tries very hard to please his Indian masters. Not sure whether he or his family are under threat in India or what. But he seemed to be under tremendous stress interviewing Modi whose educational credentials are dubious at best.

    September 28, 2014 at 3:07 pm | Reply
  12. Mirepoix

    Fareed Zakaria's programs, as many others, are biased. His recent interview of Modi, the Milosevic of India, was pitiful. It was a disgrace to journalism. He was lobbed questions that were of 10th grade calibre. Is CNN funded by Government of India? I know that CNN is an instrument of implementing America's foreign policy.

    September 28, 2014 at 2:49 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.